Financial News Outlets Finally Seeing Our Point on Losses at the Fed

Two months ago, we noted that the Federal Reserve held about $9 trillion of assets that are primarily treasury bonds and mortgage backed securities (that the Fed is not allowed to hold).  We wrote that these assets decline in value when interest rates rise, and that if the Fed accelerated the pace of quantitative tightening, it was going to see massive losses.

Bloomberg just realized the same thing.  The chart below shows losses from the peak on treasuries of around 20%.  The multi-trillion mortgage backed securities portfolio has to be at an even larger discount to that right now.

So here’s an interesting question:  If the Fed recognized $2 trillion of losses on a mark-to-market basis, and doesn’t sell those assets, would it still count as quantitative tightening?




2 thoughts on “Financial News Outlets Finally Seeing Our Point on Losses at the Fed”

    • Yes – we’ve written on that pointing out that right now, the Fed is in run-off mode and in that situation, they won’t have realized losses. But they may not be able to stay in run-off mode forever and if they have to sell something, there will be huge losses (multiple trillions). Given $31T of US on-balance sheet debt, the Fed may have more rope on QT than on higher rates as they want to avoid a death spiral (see today’s premium post on Japan and death spirals). Interesting as well that the regulators can require member banks to mark the balance sheet to market, but they’ve avoided doing the same. Thanks for the great comment!


Leave a Comment

Recent Blogs

Counter-Intuitive Inflation – Introduction

This is an excerpt from Counter-Intuitive Inflation. We’ll be posting sections over the first two weeks of October. Introduction: During inflationary times, and especially when we have high employment...

Read More

It’s My Fault

Hi All, I’ve been getting some excellent questions from subscribers. Besides being smart questions, they help me understand what has your focus and where you want and need more...

Read More